Diary 2023-12-17
If it is in your personal Scrapbox, no one else can write on it.
Expect there to be "an unknown development" by the latter. But this is a stochastic event.
Whether it will develop or not
Whether the development is beneficial or not
Whether or not I can understand the beneficial development
You are responsible for fitting your expectations, not others.
I wrote that in "[I don't expect others to do it.
By the way, substitute "AI" for "others".
At least we can force them to "read and write comments".
Development will occur, whether that development is beneficial or not is probabilistic.
The responsibility for beneficial development lies with you, not with AI.
https://gyazo.com/4760f4a1f16b3c4f026ff6a3afef13df
Mr. X has a link between concept A and B
Mr. Y has a link between concepts B and C
When Mr. X makes a statement that relates A to B and Mr. Y makes a statement that relates B to C, they both obtain a "link between the distant A and C".
Venn diagrammatic depiction of knowledge.
Overlaying the knowledge of several people on a single figure.
These are [The bias of easy drawing
https://gyazo.com/50213809434a9ab0f2342229bd853c87
In light of this, let's look back at the diagram in [One step forward question.
https://gyazo.com/a6405849c0aa9c20ab16d5c25bed6125
https://gyazo.com/8051759c04dc02278f11cf54d63c0c2c
Assuming a knowledge set of A, we asked a question on the edge of A's knowledge set: QA
This is intended to be both understandable to people in A and an opportunity to step outside of A
My own question is QB, but I don't think that comes across directly.
The explanation of X and Y is no different than what I already wrote
Z description changes.
I felt that the answer Z far from A was just not linked in my B's subjective distance space, but in Mr. C's subjective distance space, there was a link and it was a "close position".
Not an answer to the question QA itself, but an answer after "stepping back" to the concept of "difficult questions".
https://gyazo.com/da80de611f764cb311e0ef180158a99f
This one might be a little different.
In mathematics and programming, logical precision allows for concepts that are vertically longer than thinking in natural language.
Knowledge is transferred from that concept to other areas in analogy. https://gyazo.com/f57f2341dc8ce021c151bd1e1dcf59c1
アナロジー.icon
About Today's Diary
I did Dr.Stretch yesterday, fell asleep after dinner, then moved to the futon and went back to sleep and woke up around 5:00.
Did you sleep well?
https://gyazo.com/3d889fdccff517d8299507ff9a9036ad
That gave me a few crystals in my head waiting for output after I woke up.
It wasn't in the form of a clear explanation.
At any rate, I've got an output.
It became clearer and clearer as I wrote it down.
This phenomenon itself is interesting and I want to save it.
Cut it out and you'll lose it.
On the other hand, there are components that look like they should be cut out.
I don't know what's going on.
[The appropriate way to cut out the need is determined after the need is identified.
Because it's beneficial to come across cards I've written in the past.
(This is a bit dubious. I'm OK with reading over what I've written in my booklet notes for this purpose.)
Why is it beneficial to encounter something written by your past self?
Because my past self has a different perspective than my present self.
Why is it beneficial to be different?
Because dialogue with people with different perspectives leads to awareness.
Others have different perspectives, why not simply interact with others?
When others don't have knowledge about the subject you now want to develop, it costs you money to communicate it.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/日記2023-12-17 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.